As a whole, this was an interesting read. The only real complaint that I have is that I didn't have any context to the passage. Why is he arguing the four senses of Scripture and the nature of war? They seem to be two very unrelated topics. Also, I couldn't really tell if he was arguing against Augustine or agreeing with him. At times, he quoted Augustine to strengthen an idea, but then other times he seemed to be creating an opposing viewpoint. The things he said made sense, but I don't understand why he said them.
I commented on Collin's blog.
I felt the same way. It's hard to develop an appreciation and learning-thirst for a something which we relate no particular relevance to.
ReplyDelete