I found this reading rather interesting. The method he used in the exploration of his thoughts proved much like my own in that he would follow his thought process. One could tell that he was exploring as many of the different aspects that he could find. Just like in the normal human thought process he would occasionally contradict himself. In the first except I could not determine if he was in agreement with Augustine's four senses of not. Never the less I loved the open flow of his thoughts.
I also found his thoughts on a "just war" very intriguing. The thought ambushing was unbiblical because it was a form of deception. In this time period they seem to reflect on the justness of every act. I find it refreshing. Especially when we live in a time when people don't reflect on things.
P.S. I commented on Brannen's post
No comments:
Post a Comment